Obama Finally Gets His Scandal

And it's the biggest one we know of in the recent history of the United States!

I guess it was worth waiting for.

Yes, the 8 year historic reign of Mr. Obama who touted that his was the only incumbency that was scandal free, has now issued forth an epic tale of skulduggery. The level of underhandedness, straight-faced lies and judicial complicity that was undertaken by the Obama administration to undermine the 2016 Presidential election and turn it into a victory for Hillary Clinton was at a level that would make both J. Edgar Hoover and Nikita Khrushtchev green with envy. But while they may have referred to these acts of subterfuge as "business as usual", we will henceforth call it what it is:

Treason.

How else can you explain it? Ordering the FBI to tap the phone lines of the Presidential nominee of the opposition party, then giving that information to their party's nominee, then leaking other inside information to a willing and enabling press corps to cause scandal and disorganize that person's campaign. That would be, to clarify, Donald Trump, now President.

This, unlike all the other non-scandals that didn't happen in the Obama White House, just might qualify. After all, mounting a Coup d'etat to preserve the linear Progressive power structure should add the needed criminality to surpass the past misdeeds of past Presidents that all appear so much smaller now.

So, after coming so close during his American stewardship, this should put President Obama and his corrupt Administration over the top. Other scandal candidates include:

IRS Targets Conservative Groups - Not a Scandal!

How about the IRS under President Obama going after groups that

Groups with names that included terms like "Tea Party" or "Patriots" were subject to increased scrutiny and not given tax exempt status as allowed for political groups under IRS guidelines. They were asked for donor lists, details of their on-line content and information about family members. All while other "less-than-conservative" groups were given express service.

Doesn't count, says the American Media!

Gun Walking - Not Scandalous!

The infamous Gun Walking (aka Fast & Furious) plan, lead by a person totally loyal to the cause but certainly not smart enough to come up with the plan on his own, Obama's then Attorney General Eric Holder, had administration agents allowing American-made, high-powered armaments to be sold across our boarder with Mexico to the the very drug cartels our boarder agents were in conflict with. This was done to undermine the gun rights of the American citizen but instead resulted in the killing of boarder agent Brian Terry and hundreds of innocent Mexican citizens.

But that was not a scandal in the eyes of the American Media. They still touted that the Obama Administration as Scandal Free!

Not Anymore

Well that's over.

The phony Plan A and now the phony Plan B, the Russia, Russia, Russia, collusion effort has all been proven to be a hoax, a stall and yes, a crime.

It's all about Get Trump and the biggest enemies of the People that he is battling are in his own government and the Anti-Constitutional agents of our future oppression. Oh, you can be as free as you want to be...just as long as THEY get to call the shots and continue to raid the U.S. Treasury and skim their take of the money from the U.S. Taxpayer.

Can Someone Finally Go to Jail? 

Can someone finally get arrested for this stuff? Somebody? Anybody? How can these people just be walking around and getting television commentary jobs and writing books? Is there no downside to trying to overthrow the government anymore?

Take the FBI - Federal Bureau of Instigation, with Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe. Can't we send these people to jail? It's their names on the line approving the phony investigation. A very public trial is in order. Somebody please get on that, won't you?

And how about former CIA Director John Brennan? The suppression of evidence is a crime. That's what he did. He also said in his reports that Russia was interfering in the 2016 election to boost Donald Trump. A total fabrication. Can't someone find a nice cell for this Deep State operative?

Then there are those two star-crossed conspiratorial love birds, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page? Surely at least they can be scape-goated to save the others.

So many more to add but it's tiresome to think of the volume of Left Wing Revolutionaries that have conspired to steal the vote, railroad the innocent and sabotage the nation for their own gain. Until some of these Keystone Cops go to jail, this scenario will only repeat in the future.

The American Media

While we're at it, can we just forget about the concept of "The Media Got it Wrong"? They haven't gotten anything wrong. They are in on the CON. The American Media isn't working for the Deep State, they ARE the Deeps State. They are just the Propaganda Wing. I don't know why anybody listens to them, watches them or pays any attention to what they say. Ditto for the so called Conservative media outlets. There is nothing to be believed from either of them. They are all cut from the same cloth. They're all con artists.

Trust your own instincts, you'll be better off.

Our Constitutional Government

The Ghost of Benjamin Franklin and his warning should dominate our minds: "Here's your Republic...if you can keep it."

The framers of the U.S. Constitution weren't a bunch of powder-wigged fools from a bygone age. They were the most successful and educated people of the age and they lived in a time of Imperial rule and wanted to protect future generations from Kings and Dictators. That was the plan anyway.

And so far, for the most part, this system still manages to work which the 2016 election has confirmed, at least in my eyes.

There is a "push-pull" inherent in this system where each party has enjoyed an equal opportunity at governance under the law. Today we see two major and ideologically separate parties vying for governance. Historically, a swing too far to the Left has in the past resulted in a equalizing swing to the Right and so both these parties have played a roll in the governing of the country.

The Obama administration is the first one that has been so blatantly caught red-handed attempting to change this push-pull dynamic to a Putch.

And one certainly gets the feeling that this time around the Political Left felt that they were VERY close to finally taking control of the election process in 2016. Hillary Clinton would certainly have set about finishing the work that G.W. Bush and Barack Obama had laid for her and secured access to the Federal Government for the Leftist Progressives for who knows how long.

Judging by the bizarre, transparent and incomprehensible reactions of the U.S. Media and the high crimes committed by planted agents of the Left in our government since the election of Donald Trump, one has to draw the conclusion that some long-laid plans by these Dictators-in-waiting were shot to hell in the last election.

As the late, great, Fats Domino used to say, "Ain't that a shame."

EU, NATO, Let Ukraine Down

I'll bet Petro Poroshenko, the Ukrainian President misses all those nuclear weapons his nation gave up at the insistence of his European Union "brothers". Oh, they used to be a nuclear power but since they were going to be part of the EU, they were talked out of having them because the EU said, "We'll help you deal with Russia, don't you worry at all!".

The EU, invincible in peace time, invisible in war time.

Now that the shit is hitting the fan between Russia and their former national bread basket, the European Union and NATO want no part of that altercation. "We've got your back." they have said yet when the bully comes onto the playground, Ukraine turns around and finds they are on their own...again.

Such is what life must be like for the Ukrainian people. Wanting out, wanting in, wanting to be something more than a backwards farm culture and yet always being dragged back into the darkness because they don't have the resources and nobody wants the Russian army, notorious for their ability to kill people indiscriminately and break things knocking on THEIR door.

Also, they buy a lot of booze and stuff.

So Ukraine dangles. It implores, it tries it's best to hold itself together as their European "friends" look on. Will NATO send troops to be a buffer between Russia and Ukraine?

Are you high on drugs? What, do you think this is Kenya or something where all they have are rifles and can't shoot for shit? Hell no, they're not going to send troops.

Will the European Union impose more sanctions on Russia? Will their navies lend a helping hand?

I wouldn't hold my breath. I haven't heard much condemnation coming out of any EU country over the Russian taking of Ukrainian naval vessels.

After all, this is all happening in Europe. Someone is bound to have noticed.

Perhaps they are preparing a response in secret and will spring into action after the G-20 Summit?

Yes, that's it, they are going to take action as soon as they all get back to their countries.

Fat chance. 

Muslim Invaders Tear EU to Shreds

Like my mother always told me when I got into trouble and I tried to defend myself by saying that Johnny was doing it too, she’d say, “If Johnny jumped off a cliff, would you?”

So now I’d like to alter that a bit: “If Germany jumped off a cliff, should the rest of the EU do it too?”

But now, not just merely content to point the finger at the European Union countries that do NOT want these hordes of Muslim interlopers to move into their relatively peaceful nations, the EU has now come up with a plan to MAKE them take these people.

Good thinking.

And to think, before this all started, the European Union's only concern was that it was in danger of going bankrupt. Now with that notion just a quaint side story, the EU decides that it's better to just blow it up before it can collapse financially.

It’s bad enough that Germany, the country that is running the EU anyway and THINKS it has the wealth and political capital to absorb a stunning 800,000 people in just the first year, has started this human flood by declaring they will welcome as many Syrians, Afghans, Yemenis, Lebanese etc.

And so now, since Germany has finally figured out that they actually CAN’T handle the hordes of people they so naively invited in has decided to foist these people upon the nations that had the good sense in the first place to recognize what a tremendous blunder Germany was making and wanted no part of the situation.

Brilliant!

Now according to Brussels, everyone must share the burden whether they like it or not.

Or will they?

I don’t see Hungary taking the plan to force these people they have so painstakingly worked to discourage into their country. Ditto the Czech Republic and Slovakia if these Visigoths are shoved down their throats involuntarily and if they have no voice in the decision making process they will be wondering why they are involved in the EU in the first place and exploring new alliances could be in the cards. I mean, if they are just going to be marginalized and dictated to, why put up with that?

Denmark’s go the right idea. They’ve slashed welfare benefits to immigrants and if you want to settle there, you have to,,,choke,,,learn their language. What a novel idea! I'll bet Denmark is not high on the migrant list of destinations. Beat us at the border, don't let us take the trains but NO WELFARE MONEY!? Dammit! I'm going to Germany!

Even the nations that want to take these dubious refuges blanch at the staggering number of the Muslim Baby Boomers streaming across the borders into the EU. They know the writing is on the wall and their forced welcoming smiles, also like my mother told me, now held too long will freeze upon their faces.

England and France, long known for their forced sincerity are back pedaling faster than a professional Log Roller at the Lumberjack World Championships as France's cut of the immigrant pie allotment according the the EU allocation chart is far lower than the number they vowed to take originally. They have enough cars burned every year in their segregated Muslim slums and they really shouldn’t be adding any more unhappy future arsonists if they can possibly avoid it.  It also remains to be seen how many of these illegals that the United Kingdom will actually take since every time David Cameron opens his mouth the number decreases. The reality will probably be even lower.

So now it’s a grim lottery. What we will see during the “sorting out” process, once they can get to the sorting out process, will be streams of trains running in the opposite direction taking a great many of these “masses yearning to breathe free” back to wherever the hell it is they actually came from. Or maybe just close enough to count. And that is something that seems to have been outlawed in the United States but will be Job #1 in the EU in the coming months.

But they won't go quietly and they won't go peacefully. 

And the damage done to The Union will be deep and fatal. 

West Secedes Territory to Islamic Expansion

By allowing an unchecked flow of immutable peoples into their countries and by allowing them to separate themselves from long the long standing customs that have made this countries unique, the First World has invited the events that are unfolding almost everywhere these people have landed. 

France isn’t the only country that has become a battleground for Western Civilization, it’s only the biggest. The United States, United Kingdom and Spain are all just as vulnerable to these bold and escalating soft target attacks by Islamic Fundamentalists.

Back in the century leading up to the Iberians ultimate victory over the Moors in 1492, the Spaniards of that era over time became just as ruthless as their foes. They HAD to. History reveals this in its chronicles of the Spanish conquests afterwards on the North and South American continents. This hardness and convition was formed over centuries of hardship and conflict. Must we have to endure this now?

The civilized world finds itself in the same situation. Empathy is not going to do it. Empathy is going to get us all killed or forced onto prayer rugs facing Mecca.

What it will take to stop these killings is for people to rise up and quit coddling the killers or the communities that produce them.

“We should not have to prove our fealty to France.” It has been stated by the Mulism community. “Oh, but yes you do!” should be the reply.

“We are a moderate people who do not advocate such violence.” It has been said. “Well then prove it.” Should be the reply since there is only one group out there right now yelling “Alla Akbar” when they shoot a group of unarmed people, begging for their lives, in a public place in a major city. Tell me of another and I will correct myself.

If government cannot do this, then the people eventually will. People are not going to continue to stand idly by and watch their neighbors butchered without recourse and retaliation. This will happen at some point. Eventually there will be no protecting anybody and it will become a street to street war.

What is under attack by the new Islamic Fascism is not just Free Speech but Civilization itself. Republics must survive or these ignorant people from blighted and dysfunctional societies will send us all back to the dark ages. By allowing Islamic autonimous regions, host countries have invited dischord and chaos. What other group is allowed to operate in this fashion? In the U.S. our Native Americans are barely given such leeway and they were here first! 

Until we grasp the situation firmly in our minds and resolve to make not just the killers pay but the communities that produced them and even sanction the countries they are from, then our survival prospects are dim.

The families of Islamic killers should be expelled from the country and lose all assets which should then be allocated to the victims. Their names should be added to a registry and are to never return.

If a group does not want to conform to a nations educational and societal provisions then they should not be allowed to remain in the country. You want to wear a hijab to high school even though it is secular? Bye bye, wear it in your Islamic high school back in Yemen you want to wear is so bad. Only nuns wear a habit in the U.S. Are you an Islamic nun? Then lose the head gear or get out.

By compromising and giving in to the uncompromising only leads to more demands and the secession of the authority that keeps a Republic together. By granting more rights to a group of people only emboldens them to ask for more and to eventually impose their will upon other groups. We see this with the Rainbow Coalition and the NAACP who as “oppressed minorities” enjoy more rights in the workplace and in politics than the majority of people in the nation.

As events have unfolded, we can see that we have given away too much as it is. We have given too much support and too much autonomy to people who have only viewed this as a weakness.

Until the so called “Moderate” Muslim community starts mixing with the general public, starts denouncing and outing suspected radicals, why should we give them anything?

Many groups of people have come to this country in the past and conflicts have arisen but right now we don’t have Buddhists shooting up a shopping mall in the name of the Budda. We don’t have Jehovah Witnesses shooting up a coffee shop yelling “Jehovah is the only God!” We don’t have Jews shooting up a newspaper because somebody offended Israel and nobody cares about offending Catholics since the Middle Ages.

But we do seem to have a crop of Islamist Fundamentalists with murder on their minds for the slightest infraction. And as Aesop would say,  “Any excuse will serve a Tyrant”.

So why are they here? Are they here looking for a better life than the one they had where they were, to become Americans and accept the American way of life?

Or are they here to mold America to their cultish image of the world and to impose their religious ideals upon the rest of us at the end of a gun barrel?

The jury is out on that.

United States Escalating World Wide Warfare

President Obama has been taking some heat as the Republocrat War Mongers in the U.S. Congress have climbed over each other to gain the ear of the American public to make political hay from the advancing Muslim horde in Iraq.

This is one of the major public statements Mr Obama has said:

“What I just find interesting is the degree to which this issue keeps on coming up, as if this was my decision. Under the previous administration, we had turned over the country to a sovereign, democratically elected Iraqi government, so let’s just be clear: The reason that we did not have a follow-on force in Iraq was because the Iraqis — a majority of Iraqis did not want U.S. troops there, and politically they could not pass the kind of laws that would be required to protect our troops in Iraq. So that entire analysis is bogus and is wrong. But it gets frequently peddled around here by folks who oftentimes are trying to defend previous policies that they themselves made.”

And actually, what the President said here is true. The Obama administration was indeed negotiating to stay in Iraq but that notion was shot to hell when the "Democratically elected Iraqi government" refused to indemnify U.S. troops which was a critical factor in keeping a force in that country. It wasn't like it was refused once either but the Obama administration was repeatedly rebuked in it's attempts and urging for an agreement to keep U.S. troops in Iraq. But having been denied this agreement, Obama then ordered the troop withdrawal. It was all over the news. This happened three years ago in 2011 by the way.

So in fact Obama was for keeping troops in Iraq before he started taking credit for withdrawing troops, finally, from Iraq. I mean, it was a major campaign promise back when he was elected president the FIRST time in 2008. 

The Iraqi government has spoken. It's not our fight any more and really it never was. We destabilized the country and now lament that it is unstable. If Turkey wants to keep ISIS off their border I suggest they get busy and intervene their own selves. The U.S. should not be in the business of doing the dirty work for nations and governments who are unwilling to do the work and take an interest in their own defense. We've got enough to worry about right here at home.

But here in the United States, war is business. Big business.

What needs to be pointed out in all this is that the escalating arms race that we are heavily involved in is the root of the very problem we claim to be trying to solve. The more arms we supply only serves the purpose of fueling the need for, you guessed it, more armaments.

ISIS has become the best supplied army in the country why? Because they have all the tanks, Humvee and shoulder-fired rockets that we've been supplying the no-show Iraqi army. Who knew? Everybody knew! We've heard for a decade that the Iraqis weren't going to fight. Now it's a surprise. But the bottom line is: We've been sending high-end weapons over there and now ISIS' got 'em. Good Thinking!

One side orders U.S. arms to counter the arms from Russia or Iraq that the other side is getting and then we send in our armaments and so that in turn increases the orders for more Russian and Iranian made armaments. It's quite a little experiment in free market economics.

The Middle East is a weapon manufacturer's wet dream. Millions of uneducated religious fanatics going at each other driven by religious fervor, oil money and a desire to destroy the "unbelievers". The constant consumption and need for arms is just too good to pass up. And who cares if people get killed? They LIKE it when they get killed. Just too perfect.

But plenty of people who don't like it get killed too. Nothing is ultimately achieved. Generations are wasted, societies fail to advance and the people fail to prosper. Nobody is saved. It has just been a blood orgy for as long as I can remember. And many times the "Made in the U.S.A" label is on the product.

The solution is: We have to quit selling tanks to any idiot with a bank account. We've got to stop supporting demi-tyrants and dictators who's jack-boot tactics foster a dedicated opposition.
 
I don't want the Republocrats back if all they want to do is to continue fighting wars especially in the Middle East where we've been for over a decade just squandering our resources and children's futures. We don't need it and it hasn't been working, has it? 

Selling weapons is a big money maker for the U.S. and we sell the most but at some point we've got to assess what is behind the escalating violence and it the answer is in the mirror.